Sunday, February 21, 2010

City Impressions

How sustainable is Baltimore? I stumbled across the chart below while surfing Wikipedia, and couldn't help but wonder where we stand among our peers in the shameful amorphous 'us cities' blob.





Impressions

Thinking about Baltimore in purely unscientific terms, it doesn't at first give one the impression of being particularly 'green':

  • Derives it's electricity from coal and nuclear, both unsustainable long-term polluters.
  • Miserable/non-existent bike lanes and crumbling roads dangerous to bikers.
  • Sprawling suburbs contrasting with blocks and blocks of empty urban structures.
  • Many treeless streets and spaces.
  • Multiple limited, oddly-placed public transportation options which are not very well 'knit together'.
  • A geographic location requiring extensive summer AC and winter heating.

On the other hand, it does enjoy some notable green/sustainable amenities:

  • Several farmers markets offering local produce.
  • Many mixed-use neighborhoods.
  • Large numbers of vacant structures represent a capacity that can be 'reused' if the city grows (as opposed to new materials having to be used).
  • Single stream recycling.
  • Strong youth/artist subculture which promotes sustainability.
In many of these points Baltimore does not differ much from how one might imagine an average historic American city.

No comments: